Cevi vs. Relatient
2026 Comparison
Cevi delivers end-to-end workflow closure across prior auth, insurance verification, credentialing, medication management, and claims follow-up. Relatient (now Arrive Health) consolidates patient scheduling, engagement, and communication—automated reminders, recalls, surveys, online self-service—eliminating fragmented point solutions. Cevi enables operational excellence in insurance workflows; Relatient enables patient engagement consolidation. Both solve real problems; they do not compete directly.
Quick Verdict
Cevi, with AI agents tested against thousands of patient personas, with 148+ healthcare integrations, is an EHR-native AI operations platform—practices go live same-day with full control over workflows, or add white-glove managed service. Cevi and Relatient solve fundamentally different problems and should be deployed together, not as alternatives. Relatient consolidates patient scheduling, reminders, recall campaigns, and communication—eliminating fragmented engagement point solutions across 47K+ providers. Cevi closes operational workflows—prior auth, insurance verification, credentialing, medication refills, claims follow-up, and policy enforcement. Organizations deploying both achieve end-to-end coverage from patient scheduling through operational closure. Choose Cevi if insurance operations and workflow closure are your bottleneck. Choose Relatient if patient scheduling, engagement, and communication are your priority. Best-in-class organizations deploy both.
Choose Cevi if...
- You need to close prior authorization workflows end-to-end
- Insurance verification, plan matching, and claim routing are critical operational gaps
- Medication refill cycles and controlled substance protocols require automation
- Credentialing enforcement across provider × plan × location is a compliance pain point
- Practice-specific policies must be enforced automatically across workflows
- You need rapid deployment (3-7 days) with minimal IT overhead
- Same-day go-live with full practice control, or white-glove managed service
- AI agents tested against thousands of patient personas for reliability and accuracy
- Automatic knowledge base creation from practice data, policies, and procedures
- 148+ healthcare integrations (EHRs, billing, scheduling, pharmacy, communication)
- Pre-built workflow templates for instant deployment
Choose Relatient if...
- You're managing fragmentation across patient scheduling and engagement tools
- Automated reminders, recall campaigns, and patient communication are your top priorities
- You need a platform serving a large provider network (47K+)
- Reducing no-shows and improving patient engagement across multiple locations is critical
- Your patient-facing scheduling and communication experience needs consolidation
- 2024 KLAS Patient Self-Scheduling Award winner; proven patient engagement
Scorecard
| Category | Cevi | Relatient | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prior Authorization Lifecycle (Detection → Outreach → Tracking → Denial Routing) | 5 | 1 | Cevi owns the full cycle with AI criteria detection, insurance outreach, and structured denial routing. Relatient has no prior auth capabilities. |
| Insurance Verification & Sub-Plan Matching | 5 | 1 | Cevi delivers sub-plan matching, alias resolution, and verification depth. Relatient is engagement-focused; insurance verification is not a feature. |
| Patient Scheduling & Self-Service Booking | 2 | 5 | Relatient excels at online scheduling, availability management, self-service booking. Cevi is operations-focused; scheduling is not a core feature. |
| Automated Reminders & No-Show Reduction | 1 | 5 | Relatient automates multi-channel reminders and recall campaigns to reduce no-shows. Cevi focuses on operational workflows, not patient communication. |
| Medication Management (Refills, Controlled Substances, UDS, Pharmacy Callbacks) | 5 | 1 | Cevi automates refill classification, controlled substance protocols, and pharmacy callbacks. Relatient has no medication management layer. |
| Credentialing Enforcement (Provider × Plan × Location × Visit Type) | 5 | 1 | Cevi enforces credentialing matrices automatically. Relatient is engagement-focused; credentialing is not in scope. |
| Claims Follow-Up & Billing Integration | 5 | 1 | Cevi includes claims follow-up and billing workflows. Relatient does not handle claims or billing processes |
| Referral Lifecycle Management | 5 | 1 | Cevi manages referral detection, specialist matching, authorization, and closure. Relatient is engagement-only. |
| Patient Communication & Multi-Channel Engagement | 1 | 5 | Relatient offers multi-channel patient communication (SMS, email, phone, in-app). Cevi focuses on operational workflows, not patient marketing. |
| Recall Campaigns & Preventive Care Outreach | 1 | 5 | Relatient automates recall campaigns and preventive care outreach. Cevi is operations-focused, not engagement-focused. |
Patient Engagement Platform vs Operational Workflow Closure
Relatient consolidates patient scheduling, reminders, and communication across a large provider network (47K+). Cevi eliminates manual effort in insurance operations. These are parallel workflows, not competing platforms. Organizations achieve maximum value by deploying both together.
Where Cevi continues
Cevi, with AI tested against thousands of patient personas, offers same-day go-live with full practice control (no IT needed), or white-glove managed service. Cevi starts where Relatient ends. When a patient is scheduled and reminded (Relatient), Cevi takes over: automatic insurance verification, prior auth detection, medication refill classification, credentialing enforcement, referral routing, claims follow-up, and denial management. Cevi closes the entire operational loop with structured EHR-ready output. Cevi automatically creates knowledge bases from your practice data.
Where Relatient stops
Relatient's strength is unifying patient-facing engagement—scheduling, reminders, recalls, patient communication. The platform excels at reducing no-shows, improving patient engagement, and serving a large provider ecosystem (47K+ providers). But Relatient stops at patient communication. Insurance operations—prior auth, credentialing, medication refills, claims follow-up—remain manual or fragmented.
Organizations deploying Relatient for patient engagement and Cevi for operations achieve both consolidated scheduling AND workflow closure—a rare combination across a large provider network. This is the ultimate integration strategy.
Cevi path
- Patient receives appointment reminder (Relatient: SMS/email)
- Patient schedules appointment online (Relatient: self-service booking)
- Patient checks in before visit (Relatient: digital check-in confirmation)
- Cevi detects insurance requirements, prior auth, refills, credentialing—AUTOMATICALLY
- Cevi delivers structured output to EHR and billing systems
- All workflows close with audit trail, compliance logging, and denial routing
Relatient path
- Patient receives appointment reminder (Relatient: SMS/email)
- Patient schedules appointment online (Relatient: self-service booking)
- Patient checks in before visit (Relatient: digital check-in confirmation)
- Operations team handles insurance/auth/medication/billing MANUALLY
Where Operational Workflows Diverge
Relatient excels at patient-facing workflow initiation (scheduling, reminders). Cevi excels at operational workflow closure (prior auth, medication management, claims). Here's how each platform handles critical operational scenarios:
Trigger: Orthopedic surgery requires pre-auth for certain procedures
Cevi
- Patient checked in; Cevi detects visit type and insurance plan
- AI matches criteria against insurance library (sub-plan level)
- Cevi initiates structured outreach to insurance with all required data
- Tracks response; sends delay alerts if no approval in 48 hours
- Routes denials to practice management with remediation guidance
- Delivers structured auth decision to EHR
Relatient
- Patient scheduled via Relatient; reminder sent
- Staff member manually checks insurance requirements
- Staff initiates outreach to insurance
- No automated tracking or delay alerts
Revenue Impact
Relatient improves patient engagement and reduces no-shows (scheduling-side revenue). Cevi prevents revenue leakage through insurance lifecycle automation, claims follow-up, medication/credentialing compliance, and denial prevention (operations-side revenue). Both are needed for complete revenue protection.
Procedures performed without pre-approval, resulting in claim denial
Cevi
Cevi detects required auth upfront and initiates outreach; procedures approved or rescheduled before delivery
Relatient
Relatient schedules the visit; no insurance operations layer. Claim denied post-service.
$500–$5,000 per denied procedure; 5–15% of complex cases
Patients miss appointments, resulting in lost revenue
Cevi
Cevi does not address patient reminders; insurance operations stay on track when patient shows up
Relatient
Relatient prevents no-shows through automated multi-channel reminders. Proven no-show reduction.
$100–$500 per no-show; 15–25% no-show rate without reminders
Patients unable to refill prescriptions due to compliance gaps
Cevi
Cevi verifies pharmacy, DEA, UDS, and payer rules; delivers compliant refill order immediately
Relatient
Relatient has patient communication; staff manually verifies compliance. Delays = patient non-adherence.
$50–$200 per delayed refill; 2–5% refill abandonment rate
Claims denied because provider not credentialed for that plan/location
Cevi
Cevi enforces credentialing matrix; prevents billing if credential gap exists
Relatient
Relatient doesn't track credentialing. Claims denied post-service; rework required.
$200–$1,000 per credentialing denial; 3–7% of claims
Claims unpaid because follow-up stopped after initial submission
Cevi
Cevi tracks claims, initiates automated follow-up at 30, 60, 90 days, routes denials
Relatient
Relatient is patient-facing; no claims follow-up. Manual tracking = revenue leaks.
$1,000–$10,000 per month in aging A/R
Referrals lost because no authorization or specialty match
Cevi
Cevi verifies referral auth and specialty matching; ensures closure and payment
Relatient
Relatient schedules referred visits; no insurance or specialty validation. Referrals may be non-authorized.
$500–$2,000 per lost referral; 10–20% of outbound referrals
Manual insurance verification, prior auth, pharmacy callbacks, claims follow-up
Cevi
Cevi automates all; 20+ hours/week of staff time recovered
Relatient
Relatient reduces scheduling time; insurance operations remain manual.
$5,000–$15,000/month in staff labor for mid-size practice
Patients miss preventive care visits; recalls not executed effectively
Cevi
Cevi does not address patient communication or recall campaigns
Relatient
Relatient automates recall campaigns and preventive care outreach. Improves patient engagement.
$50K–$200K/year in lost preventive care revenue
Staff Workload Reduction
Relatient reduces patient-facing workload (scheduling, reminders). Cevi reduces operational workload (insurance, auth, refills, claims). Together they eliminate 35+ hours/week of manual work. Deploying both achieves maximum operational efficiency.
Patient Scheduling & Reminder Follow-Up
Relatient saves 10–12 hrs/week; Cevi saves nothing in this category15–20 hrs/week (manual scheduling, reminder calls, cancellation chasing)
Cevi
15–20 hrs/week (unchanged; Cevi doesn't address scheduling)
Relatient
5–8 hrs/week (Relatient automates scheduling, reminders, recalls)
Insurance Verification & Prior Auth Outreach
Cevi saves 9–13 hrs/week; Relatient saves nothing in this category10–15 hrs/week (manual payer portal checks, call-ins, follow-up)
Cevi
1–2 hrs/week (Cevi automates detection, outreach, tracking)
Relatient
10–15 hrs/week (unchanged; Relatient is engagement-focused)
Medication Refill Verification & Pharmacy Callbacks
Cevi saves 7–8 hrs/week; Relatient saves nothing in this category8–10 hrs/week (manual DEA/UDS checks, pharmacy calls)
Cevi
1–2 hrs/week (Cevi automates compliance checks and pharmacy callbacks)
Relatient
8–10 hrs/week (unchanged; Relatient is patient-facing)
Credentialing Verification & Enforcement
Cevi saves 5–6 hrs/week; Relatient saves nothing in this category6–8 hrs/week (manual matrix checks, renewal tracking)
Cevi
1–2 hrs/week (Cevi enforces matrix automatically)
Relatient
6–8 hrs/week (unchanged; Relatient is engagement-focused)
Claims Follow-Up & Denial Management
Cevi saves 6–9 hrs/week; Relatient saves nothing in this category8–12 hrs/week (spreadsheet tracking, payer calls, appeal preparation)
Cevi
2–3 hrs/week (Cevi automates follow-up and routes denials with remediation)
Relatient
8–12 hrs/week (unchanged; Relatient is engagement-focused)
Patient Communication & Outreach Calls
Relatient saves 9–11 hrs/week; Cevi saves nothing in this category12–15 hrs/week (reminder calls, cancellation chasing, campaign execution)
Cevi
12–15 hrs/week (unchanged; Cevi doesn't handle patient communication)
Relatient
3–5 hrs/week (Relatient automates reminders, recalls, campaigns)
Policy Enforcement & Compliance Tracking
Cevi saves 4–5 hrs/week; Relatient saves nothing in this category5–7 hrs/week (manual policy checks, renewal alerts, compliance verification)
Cevi
1–2 hrs/week (Cevi enforces practice-specific policies automatically)
Relatient
5–7 hrs/week (unchanged; Relatient is engagement-focused)
TOTAL TIME SAVED BY BOTH PLATFORMS
Cevi + Relatient together save 35+ hrs/week; deploying both is essential for maximum efficiency64–87 hrs/week across all operations
Cevi
33–48 hrs/week (operations-side automation only)
Relatient
49–67 hrs/week (patient-side automation only)
Trust, Compliance & Data Integrity
| Dimension | Cevi | Relatient |
|---|---|---|
| HIPAA Compliance & Patient Data Security | HIPAA, GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, and ISO 27701 compliant | Relatient: HIPAA BAA standard. Patient data secured; focus on patient communication compliance (consent, opt-out tracking). |
| Insurance Data Accuracy & Sub-Plan Matching | Cevi: Validates insurance data against real-time payer feeds. Sub-plan matching prevents billing mismatches. Alias resolution catches plan name variations. | Relatient: Engagement data accuracy; doesn't validate against payer feeds. Insurance ops are not in scope. |
| Credentialing & Provider Verification | Cevi: Enforces credentialing matrix. Tracks renewal dates. Prevents non-credentialed providers from generating billable work. | Relatient: Provider scheduling is flexible; credentialing enforcement not a feature. |
| Medication Safety & Controlled Substance Compliance | HIPAA, GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, and ISO 27701 compliant | Relatient: Patient medication lists stored; no DEA/UDS/compliance enforcement. |
| Claims & Billing Audit Trail | Cevi: Full audit trail from auth decision → claim submission → follow-up → denial routing. Compliant with payer requirements and state laws. | Relatient: Patient communication audit trail; not claims-focused. No audit trail for insurance operations. |
| Consent & Communication Compliance | HIPAA, GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, and ISO 27701 compliant | Relatient: Strong consent/opt-out tracking for patient communications and reminders. Best-in-class for engagement compliance. |
Implementation & Integration Approach
| Dimension | Cevi | Relatient |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment Timeline | Cevi: 3–7 days. API-driven. Minimal configuration. Connects to existing EHR, billing, and payer feeds. | Relatient: 6–10 weeks. Scheduling configuration, EHR integration setup, workflow mapping, multi-location rollout planning. |
| EHR Integration | API integrations to major EHR, PM, and billing platforms — Epic, Oracle Health, MEDITECH, athenahealth, eClinicalWorks, NextGen, and more. Works alongside existing systems or as the front-end layer. | Relatient: Patient scheduling and communication data → EHR. Bidirectional integration with major EHRs (Epic, Cerner, Athena, Greenway, NextGen, etc.). |
| Billing System Integration | API integrations to major EHR, PM, and billing platforms — Epic, Oracle Health, MEDITECH, athenahealth, eClinicalWorks, NextGen, and more. Works alongside existing systems or as the front-end layer. | Relatient: Light integration. Scheduling and patient data only. Billing operations not in scope. |
| Payer Integration | API integrations to major EHR, PM, and billing platforms — Epic, Oracle Health, MEDITECH, athenahealth, eClinicalWorks, NextGen, and more. Works alongside existing systems or as the front-end layer. | Relatient: Payer integration not a feature. Scheduling and engagement are payer-agnostic. |
| Data Migration | Cevi: Light data migration. Pulls real-time insurance and claim data from payer feeds; historical prior auth/refill data optional. | Relatient: Moderate data migration. Appointment history, patient communication data, scheduling preferences from legacy systems. Multi-location coordination. |
| Staff Training | Cevi: 1–2 days. Operations team learns insurance workflow automation, denial routing, prior auth tracking. | Relatient: 2–4 weeks. Scheduling, reception, communication teams learn platform; multi-location training coordination. |
| Change Management | Cevi: Low organizational friction. Existing workflows remain; Cevi adds automation underneath. | Relatient: Moderate friction. Requires consolidating scheduling systems, retraining reception/scheduling teams, workflow redesign across multiple locations. |
Why Choose Cevi
Prior Authorization Lifecycle Automation
Cevi detects required prior authorizations, initiates insurance outreach with structured data, tracks responses, sends delay alerts, and routes denials with remediation guidance. Relatient has no prior auth capabilities.
Insurance Verification & Sub-Plan Matching
Cevi validates insurance data against real-time payer feeds, performs sub-plan matching to prevent billing mismatches, and resolves plan aliases. Relatient is engagement-focused; insurance verification is not a feature.
Medication Refill & Controlled Substance Protocols
Cevi automates refill classification, enforces DEA and state-level controlled substance rules, verifies UDS status, initiates pharmacy callbacks, and prevents non-compliant refills. Relatient has no medication management layer.
Credentialing Enforcement Across Provider × Plan × Location × Visit Type
Cevi stores and enforces credentialing matrices automatically, preventing billing if credentialing gaps exist. Relatient's provider scheduling is flexible but doesn't enforce credentialing rules.
Referral Lifecycle Management
Cevi detects referral requirements, validates specialty matching, initiates prior authorization, tracks specialist response, and ensures closure and payment. Relatient schedules referred visits but doesn't manage referral authorization.
Claims Follow-Up & Denial Routing
Cevi monitors claim status, initiates automated follow-up at 30/60/90 days, routes denials with remediation rules, and delivers resolved claim status back to EHR. Relatient is patient-facing; claims are not in scope.
Practice-Specific Policy Enforcement
Cevi enforces practice-specific policies automatically (e.g., 30-day medication refill limits, provider specialization rules, visit type restrictions). Relatient doesn't enforce operational policies.
Deployment Speed
Cevi deploys in 3–7 days with minimal configuration. Relatient requires 6–10 weeks of scheduling setup, EHR integration, and multi-location coordination.
EHR-Ready Structured Output
Cevi outputs structured insurance decisions, refill orders, credentialing status, and claims data directly to EHR. Relatient's data is scheduling-centric; EHR output is appointment and patient data only.
Deployment Flexibility
Cevi works as a layer on top of your existing EHR and PM systems — or as the front-end interface for patient interactions. Either way, it's live in under a week with no IT overhead.
Same-Day Go-Live & Full Practice Control
Practices can deploy without IT involvement and go live same-day. Alternatively, add white-glove managed service for seamless implementation.
148+ Healthcare Integrations
Connects to 148+ platforms including EHRs (Epic, Cerner, Athena), billing systems, scheduling, pharmacy, communication, and more.
Why Choose Relatient
Patient Scheduling at Scale (47K+ Provider Network)
Relatient serves one of the largest provider networks (47K+ providers) with proven scheduling excellence. Cevi is operations-focused; scheduling is not a core feature.
Automated Reminders & No-Show Reduction
Relatient automates multi-channel reminders (SMS, email, phone) and has demonstrated no-show reduction. 2024 KLAS Patient Self-Scheduling Award winner. Cevi is operations-focused; patient communication is not a feature.
Patient Recall Campaigns & Preventive Care Outreach
Relatient offers recall automation and preventive care campaign templates. Cevi doesn't include patient marketing tools.
Multi-Channel Patient Communication (SMS, Email, Phone, In-App)
Relatient supports SMS, email, phone, and in-app messaging for patient engagement. Cevi focuses on operational workflows, not patient marketing.
Large Provider Ecosystem & Network Effects
Relatient's 47K+ provider network creates ecosystem value and integration opportunities. Cevi is a specialized operations platform; ecosystem is growing.
Cevi May Not Be Best If
Patient Scheduling & Appointment Management
Cevi is not a scheduling platform. For patient-facing scheduling, Relatient is the better choice. Many organizations deploy both: Relatient for patient scheduling, Cevi for operations.
Reminder & Recall Campaigns
Cevi doesn't include automated reminders or recall campaigns. Relatient is best-in-class for reducing no-shows through patient communication.
Serving Large Provider Networks
Cevi deploys in under one week with broad API integrations to any existing system. Relatient has proven capability serving 47K+ providers. For large-scale deployments, Relatient has more ecosystem maturity.
Relatient May Not Be Best If
Prior Authorization & Insurance Operations
Relatient has no prior auth, insurance verification, or claims follow-up capabilities. For insurance operations, Cevi is the only choice.
Medication Refill & Controlled Substance Compliance
Relatient doesn't enforce DEA rules, UDS verification, or controlled substance protocols. Cevi is required for medication management and compliance.
Credentialing Enforcement
Relatient's scheduling is flexible; credentialing enforcement is not a feature. Cevi enforces credentialing matrices automatically.
Claims Follow-Up & Denial Routing
Relatient is patient-facing; claims follow-up is out of scope. Cevi handles claims lifecycle, denial routing, and revenue recovery.
Referral Lifecycle Management
Relatient schedules referred visits; Cevi manages the full referral lifecycle (auth, specialty matching, closure). For referral operations, Cevi is required.
Rapid Deployment (Days vs Weeks)
Cevi deploys in 3–7 days. Relatient requires 6–10 weeks of configuration. For fast time-to-value, Cevi is superior.
Feature Comparison
Self-service scheduling, reminders, recalls, patient communication—the patient-facing front door.
| Feature | Cevi | Relatient |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Self-Service Scheduling Patients schedule appointments online without staff intervention | No Not a feature; Cevi focuses on operations | Yes Core feature; automated scheduling, availability rules, resource management |
| Automated Multi-Channel Reminders SMS, email, and phone reminders to reduce no-shows | No Not in Cevi roadmap | Yes Core feature; customizable, multi-channel, proven no-show reduction |
| Patient Recall & Preventive Care Campaigns Automated recall campaigns for preventive care and follow-ups | No Not a feature | Yes Strong; campaign templates, automation, segmentation |
| Multi-Channel Patient Communication (SMS, Email, Phone, In-App) Reach patients across multiple communication channels | No Not a feature | Yes Multi-channel delivery; SMS, email, voice, in-app messaging |
| Patient Portal & Self-Service Patients view upcoming appointments, access records, message providers | Partial Cevi integrates with EHR portals but doesn't build one | Yes Full patient portal with messaging, appointment management |
| Patient Surveys & Satisfaction Tracking Automated patient surveys and satisfaction measurement | No Not a feature | Yes Automated survey delivery and analytics |
Insurance verification, prior authorization detection and tracking, credentialing, claims follow-up.
| Feature | Cevi | Relatient |
|---|---|---|
| Insurance Verification & Real-Time Eligibility Verify patient insurance, eligibility, coverage limits, copays, deductibles | Yes Real-time verification against payer feeds; sub-plan matching; alias resolution | No Not a feature; engagement-focused |
| Prior Authorization Detection & Outreach Detect required prior authorizations, initiate insurance outreach, track responses | Yes Core feature; AI detection, structured outreach, response tracking, delay alerts | No Not a feature |
| Sub-Plan Matching & Alias Resolution Match insurance plans at sub-plan level; resolve plan name aliases | Yes Prevents billing mismatches; real-time payer data feeds | No Not in scope |
| Credentialing Matrix Enforcement Verify provider credentialing across plan × location × visit type combinations | Yes Enforces matrix; prevents billing if credential gap exists | No Scheduling is flexible; credentialing not enforced |
| Prior Auth Tracking & Delay Alerts Track pending authorizations; alert if no response within SLA | Yes Automated tracking, configurable SLAs, escalation workflows | No Not a feature |
| Claims Follow-Up & Status Tracking Monitor claim status; initiate follow-up at 30/60/90 days; track resolution | Yes Automated monitoring; follow-up initiation; aging A/R visibility | No Not a feature; engagement-focused |
| Denial Routing & Remediation Route claim denials to appropriate team member with remediation guidance | Yes Smart routing; denial code mapping; remediation rules per practice policy | No Not in scope |
Refill classification, controlled substance protocols, DEA/UDS compliance, pharmacy callbacks.
| Feature | Cevi | Relatient |
|---|---|---|
| Medication Refill Classification Classify refills as routine or restricted based on drug properties | Yes Automatic classification; rule-based routing | No Not a feature |
| Controlled Substance Protocols & DEA Compliance Enforce DEA rules for opioids, benzodiazepines, other controlled substances | Yes Built-in DEA rules; state-level variations; compliance logging | No Not in scope |
| UDS (Urine Drug Screen) Verification Verify patient UDS status if required for controlled substance refills | Yes Integration with lab systems; requirement enforcement | No Not a feature |
| Pharmacy Callback Automation Initiate automated callbacks to confirm controlled substance refills | Yes Structured callbacks; compliance documentation | No Not a feature |
| Practice-Specific Refill Policies Enforce practice rules (e.g., 30-day limits for opioids, refill frequency caps) | Yes Configurable policies; automatic enforcement | No Not a feature |
Frequently Asked Questions
Should we deploy both Cevi and Relatient?
Yes. They solve different problems and complement each other. Relatient handles patient scheduling, reminders, communication, and engagement. Cevi handles operational workflows (prior auth, insurance verification, credentialing, medication management, claims follow-up). Together, they eliminate 35+ hours/week of manual work and provide both scheduling efficiency (Relatient) and operational workflow closure (Cevi). This is the ultimate integration strategy.
Does Cevi replace scheduling systems?
No. Cevi is not a scheduling platform. For scheduling, patient reminders, and engagement, Relatient or another dedicated scheduling system is required. Cevi operates downstream of scheduling—when a patient is checked in, Cevi automates insurance operations.
Does Relatient handle insurance operations?
No. Relatient is scheduling and engagement-focused. It doesn't include prior auth, insurance verification, credentialing enforcement, medication management, or claims follow-up. For those workflows, Cevi is required.
What's the ROI timeline for Cevi vs Relatient?
Cevi: 20+ hours/week of staff time freed in week 2; denial reduction in month 1; full ROI (staff hours + reduced denials) in 90 days. Relatient: No-show reduction in month 1; scheduling efficiency in month 2; full ROI in 6–12 months. Cevi has faster payback; Relatient has broader patient engagement benefits.
Can Cevi and Relatient integrate with our existing EHR?
Yes. Cevi integrates bidirectionally with most EHRs (Epic, Cerner, Athena, NextGen, Kareo, etc.) for operations data. Relatient integrates bidirectionally for scheduling and communication. Both platforms support HL7 and FHIR standards.
How large is Relatient's provider network?
Relatient serves 47K+ healthcare providers across health systems and practices. This large network creates ecosystem value and integration opportunities. The platform has proven scalability across enterprise deployments and won the 2024 KLAS Patient Self-Scheduling Award.
How does Cevi's prior auth detection work?
Cevi uses AI to detect required prior authorizations based on patient diagnosis, insurance plan, visit type, and procedure codes. When a prior auth is required, Cevi initiates structured outreach to the insurance company with all required clinical data. Cevi tracks the response and sends delay alerts if no approval is received within the SLA. If denied, Cevi routes the denial with remediation guidance.
Does Relatient reduce no-shows?
Yes. Relatient automates multi-channel reminders (SMS, email, phone) and has demonstrated no-show reduction. Automated recall campaigns and patient engagement workflows drive higher appointment completion rates. Relatient won the 2024 KLAS Patient Self-Scheduling Award.
This comparison is based on publicly available information from vendor websites, case studies, and product documentation as of March 2026. Relatient capabilities sourced from relatient.com and Greenway Health integration details. Relatient is now part of Arrive Health (arrival.health). Relatient has served 47K+ providers with focus on patient scheduling, reminders, recalls, and engagement. 2024 KLAS Patient Self-Scheduling Award confirmation. Cevi capabilities based on core product definition: end-to-end ambulatory workflow closure with EHR-ready output, prior auth lifecycle, medication management, credentialing enforcement, referral management, and practice-level policy enforcement. The comparison assumes familiarity with healthcare operations terminology and is intended for healthcare IT decision-makers evaluating platforms for their specific operational needs. Both vendors actively release new features; verify current capabilities directly with sales teams before making final implementation decisions.